Brzezinski's Ghost: The Geopolitics of the Trump Administration
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/806dd/806dd9e49a30e14bf5fb5322e7760a84e54223b8" alt=""
National Endowment for Democracy an NGO controlled by the CIA; Reagan Administration guarantees Soviets no movement of NATO eastward in return for peaceful reunification of Germany under NATO; top secret CONPLAN 8022 global strike capability activated June 2004 by Rumsfeld; fake NED and NGO democracy apparatus orchestrates both the Ukraine Orange Color Revolution of 2004 and the Georgian Rose Revolution; Soros Foundation deeply involved in both Ukrainian color revolutions; 2018 Armenian Revolution follows the fake democracy script; US economic sanctions on Russian oligarchs; Trump administration abrogation of 2015 nuclear treaty with Iran and European reaction; EU activation of 1996 Blocking Statute symbolic; US secondary sanctions effective; US Treasury becomes a central component of national intelligence council; Secretary of State Pompeo’s twelve draconian conditions for Iran constitute economic warfare on that country; Netanyahu meets Putin on May 9th for talks on future of Syria and Iran; Russia limits its involvement in Syria; continuity of Trump Administration geopolitics; three Eurasian powers – Russia, China and Iran – systematically targeted a la Paul Wolfowitz’s Defense Planning Guidance and Zbigniew Brzezinski’s The Grand Chessboard; US trade war with China; Made in China 2025 policy to replace China 2035 co-written by Robert Zoellick and the World Bank; hyper-instability of global geopolitical situation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/074df/074df7b8a489aeaf7ff6cd0674baeaf280d610fc" alt=""
Posted in Geopolitics
Recent
Archive
2023
2022
February
September
2021
2020
2019
January
March
June
July
September
2018
January
April
June
July
August
2017
April
July
October
2016
March
1 Comment
I have wondered how the U.S. could decide to renege after signing the JCPOA. When I last checked, I read that it was not formally a treaty, but rather was "a political declaration, not a legally binding agreement" (to quote an article on the Council on Foreign Relations website). It sounds weasel-ly to me, as though the U.S never meant to commit to it.